PeMe012 < Main

Tags: , view all tags

Subject: Re: Final (?) Version. %BR%
From: pedro mercadante <mercadan@fnal.gov> %BR%
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:04:27 -0300 %BR%
To: Greg Landsberg <landsberg@hep.brown.edu> %BR%
CC: "'Sergio M. Lietti'" <lietti@fnal.gov>
 
 
Hi Greg, %BR%
> Hi Pedro,
>
> Looks good. A few comments:
>
> 0) Put page numbers - it would make it easier for people to comment during
> your presentation.
>
>
Ok %BR%
> 1) P2 - PYTHIA is misspelled;
>
>
Ok %BR%
> 2) P7 - CTEQ5L is misspelled;
>
>
Ok %BR%
> 3) So, all the "right-hand" plots are after the "best" cuts, not just the SS
> requirement? 
> 
> 
No, it is just the SS requirement. Maybe I should put the plots before the comment on cuts. They motivate the cuts. 
> 4) State signal significance and expected yield after these cuts. 
> 
>
Ok, the signal significance is easy. I can try to state the yield with a few more UED points. %BR%
> 5) I think what you put for the SS dimuons is sufficient. 
> 
Ok. %BR%
> 6) In the conclusions I'd also emphasize SS e-mu channel, not just SS 
> dimuons. 
> 
> 
I guess you are right. Maybe e-mu could be a very good channel as they have different characteristic and maybe they kill the jet bg in different way.What about
e e? Should be a little harder?  %BR%
> Greg 
> 
>  
> 
Pedro.

Topic revision: r1 - 2006-11-16 - SergioLietti

antalya escort bursa escort eskisehir escort istanbul escort izmir escort